
At the start of the 1990s, fashion photography could look like a world built around extraordinary faces. It could also look like someone stepping out of an ordinary front door. Both pictures belonged to the same decade. The tension between them is what makes the period so interesting to me as a photographer.
Peter Lindbergh’s January 1990 British Vogue cover announced the age of the supermodel. Yet, only a year later, Jason Evans used a suburban street to question who fashion editorials pictured and how. Herb Ritts and David Sims show that sculptural glamour and visual experimentation did not simply vanish when magazines embraced a rougher, more immediate look.
This visual essay reads four photographs closely, then follows the shift through Corinne Day’s own archive. It is a story about creative choices, not a claim that the decade had one style.
What defined 1990s fashion photography?
The decade made room for competing visual languages. Supermodel portraiture and polished advertising remained powerful, while independent magazines brought street settings, youth culture, looser styling, and questions of identity into fashion imagery. The V&A’s history of fashion photography identifies Corinne Day, David Sims, Craig McDean, and Jason Evans with the naturalistic approach that gained ground in the 1990s. The strongest work used those choices to say something about its moment, not just to display clothes.
Peter Lindbergh’s 1990 Vogue cover and the supermodel era
Lindbergh photographed Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista, Tatjana Patitz, Christy Turlington, and Cindy Crawford for the January 1990 British Vogue cover. Vogue’s archive notes that the session took place in November 1989. That distinction matters. The photograph was made at the end of one decade and appeared at the opening of the next.

Photography: Peter Lindbergh. Publication: British Vogue, January 1990. Source: Vogue archive. View the source and image credit.
What holds me is the proximity. The five women press into one frame, yet each face keeps its own expression. The black and white treatment removes the easy distraction of color, while the close crop makes personality the visual event. This is a cover that sells recognition as much as fashion. Our earlier essay on ten iconic fashion photographs placed Lindbergh among the images that shaped the field. Here, the cover is a starting point for a larger change.
Lindbergh’s portrait also complicates the divide between glamour and realism. The faces are famous, but the closeness and individual expressions give the picture a human scale. For a wider view of this portraiture, Peter Lindbergh. On Fashion Photography. 45th Edition brings together more than 300 images in a compact TASCHEN retrospective.
How Herb Ritts kept glamour in the frame
It is tempting to tell the nineties as a clean break from polish to grit. Herb Ritts’s 1990 photograph Versace Dress, Back View, El Mirage makes that story too simple. At the Getty’s Herb Ritts exhibition, the museum describes a tarp stretched on a metal frame and moved with wind machines. Christy Turlington appears within a dark, architectural form.

Photography: Herb Ritts. Work: Versace Dress, Back View, El Mirage, 1990. © Herb Ritts Foundation. Source: J. Paul Getty Museum. View the source and image credit.
The construction is elaborate, but the frame feels effortless. Ritts uses shape, skin, and directional light to make the dress part of a larger sculpture. As a photographer, I see a reminder that a highly controlled set can still leave room for surprise. The wind changes the form. The image depends on that movement. Herb Ritts: L.A. Style, the Getty exhibition catalogue, places this photograph within his wider approach to light, form, fashion, and portraiture. Nineties fashion photography did not abandon the studio’s imagination. It expanded the range of places where an editorial image could happen.
Ritts’s image is useful beside Evans’s suburban photograph because both settings are purposeful. One constructs an extraordinary landscape around a body. The other makes an ordinary location part of the social meaning of the clothes. Neither choice is automatically more honest.
How i-D and The Face changed fashion editorials
The shift was also about who appeared in fashion pictures. Jason Evans’s Strictly, published in i-D in 1991, placed Black subjects and sharp styling against familiar suburban architecture. Aperture’s history of fashion photography records Evans’s interest in the assumptions viewers bring to Black youth, white suburbia, and the figure of the dandy.

Photography: Jason Evans. Work: Untitled, from Strictly, 1991. Courtesy the artist. Source: Aperture. View the source and image credit.
Look at the distance between the posed figure and the house. The ordinary brick wall gives the clothes a social setting instead of a neutral backdrop. The picture asks the viewer to read the place as carefully as the styling. That is a different kind of fashion story, one where location has an argument of its own.
Corinne Day’s early work for The Face made another kind of intimacy visible. The National Portrait Gallery’s exhibition on The Face describes the magazine as a place where photographers could reimagine fashion’s visual language. The Corinne Day Estate traces her first published fashion story to 1990 and describes the March 1993 British Vogue commission that brought her approach to a much larger audience. Day’s casual settings and unguarded mood changed what a fashion editorial could feel like. To explore the editorial world around that work, The Face Magazine: Culture Shift surveys the magazine from 1980 to 2004, placing its nineties photography within a broader history of music, style, and youth culture.
These photographs deserve more than a nostalgic label. A casual setting or an unpolished surface does not make a photograph unplanned. Casting, styling, framing, and editorial selection still shape what we see. Reading the work closely means asking both how the picture feels and whose experience it places at the center.
How David Sims used movement in 1995 fashion photography
David Sims’s Yohji Yamamoto, Autumn/Winter 1995, in the Getty’s Icons of Style exhibition, brings the argument forward five years. A figure appears to kick or leap across a pale frame. The coat spreads around the body, and the hairstyle amplifies the gesture.

Photography: David Sims. Work: Yohji Yamamoto, Autumn/Winter 1995. Courtesy of and © David Sims. Source: J. Paul Getty Museum. View the source and image credit.
This is neither a candid street picture nor the fixed pose we might expect from a luxury campaign. The garment becomes legible through motion. The mostly empty background gives that movement nowhere to hide. For me, the lesson is practical: a fashion photograph can reveal construction, attitude, and energy in the same instant when the pose serves the clothing rather than competing with it.
What can photographers learn from 1990s fashion photography?
The useful lesson is not to imitate grain, a particular model, or a supposedly authentic location. It is to decide what the image needs to say and make every choice support it.
01
Give the setting a job
A street, studio, or improvised set changes the meaning of the clothes.
02
Let the subject remain specific
Presence and personality can carry a frame more powerfully than perfection.
03
Use movement deliberately
Motion can show how a garment behaves and how a person inhabits it.
04
Question the frame
Ask whose image the editorial centers and what assumptions the picture repeats or challenges.
A contemporary response: street life and studio color
These two photographs are from my 2026 fashion editorials. They show how the decade’s questions about setting and gesture still inform my work today. For Stacy’s studio story, the expressive wardrobe came from West Coast Leather, the top leather boutique in San Francisco in this overview of the city’s leather stores.

Street setting. Lily Stadil at Place Vendôme, Paris, 2026. A passing cyclist makes everyday life part of the fashion frame. Photograph by Paul Tocatlian. View the original editorial and image source.

Studio gesture. Stacy Huang on a pink set, 2026. The raised jacket makes clothing and movement the focus. Fashion by West Coast Leather. Photograph by Paul Tocatlian. View the original editorial and image source.
These principles are part of why I return to fashion history when planning contemporary fashion and editorial photography. The decade’s most lasting contribution may be permission to choose a point of view rather than a single approved look.
Why 1990s fashion photography still matters
The nineties were never one visual trend. Lindbergh’s faces, Ritts’s constructed elegance, Evans’s socially charged street setting, and Sims’s moving silhouette make a better map of the decade than a simple glamour-to-grunge timeline. Each photograph uses fashion to propose a way of seeing people and the world around them.
That is the part I carry into my own work. Before deciding how polished or spontaneous an image should feel, I want to know what the picture is actually about.
Sources and further reading
Vogue archive: the January 1990 supermodel cover · Getty: Herb Ritts and fashion · Aperture: a century of fashion in twelve photographs · Getty: Icons of Style · Corinne Day Estate archive · V&A: 100 years of fashion photography · National Portrait Gallery: The Face magazine.
Frequently Asked Questions
What changed in fashion photography during the 1990s?
The 1990s widened fashion photography’s visual range. Supermodel covers and polished campaigns remained influential, while independent magazines embraced street settings, youth culture, documentary moods, and more varied ideas about identity.
Who were influential 1990s fashion photographers?
Peter Lindbergh, Herb Ritts, Corinne Day, Jason Evans, and David Sims each shaped a different part of the decade. Their work shows why no single style can stand for all 1990s fashion photography.
Did glamour disappear from fashion photography in the 1990s?
No. Polished supermodel portraits and constructed images such as Herb Ritts’s 1990 Versace photograph coexisted with street settings and documentary moods. The decade expanded fashion photography’s visual range.
Why is Peter Lindbergh’s January 1990 British Vogue cover important?
The close black and white portrait brought Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista, Tatjana Patitz, Christy Turlington, and Cindy Crawford together in one memorable frame. Lindbergh photographed it in November 1989, and British Vogue published it in January 1990.
What role did i-D and The Face play in 1990s fashion photography?
Independent magazines gave photographers space to bring youth culture, everyday settings, and questions of identity into fashion editorials. Jason Evans’s 1991 Strictly series for i-D and Corinne Day’s early work for The Face show two different approaches.
What can photographers learn from 1990s fashion editorials?
Make the setting, subject, and movement serve a clear idea. The photographs in this essay show how those choices can reveal a garment while also saying something about the person and the world around them.
Never Miss a Story: Choose Kisau Photography as a preferred source in Google to see more of our articles. Add Kisau Photography.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Photoshoot Credits
Title graphic: Kisau Photography.
Archive photography: Peter Lindbergh for British Vogue. Vogue archive.
Archive photography: Herb Ritts. © Herb Ritts Foundation. Getty source.
Archive photography: Jason Evans, courtesy the artist. Aperture source.
Archive photography: David Sims. © David Sims. Getty source.
Contemporary photography: Paul Tocatlian for Kisau Photography.
Contemporary models: Lily Stadil in Paris and Stacy Huang in the studio. Studio fashion: West Coast Leather.
Bring Your Vision to Life
Whether you have a polished moodboard or just a spark of an idea, let’s translate that concept into high-impact imagery. We collaborate with brands, designers, and creatives to execute these ideas across fashion editorials, campaigns, and events.
Get the Latest Articles
Receive an email whenever a new article is published. No weekly newsletter or extra messages, just new work when it goes live.
Unsubscribe anytime.